This research identifies challenges in bivariate data analysis among engineering students, highlighting active methodologies' role in fostering statistical reasoning.
Data analysis is essential in engineering sciences for the making of informed decisions. This article characterizes the level of statistical reasoning in engineering students based on the model of Wild and Pfannkuch. Through a research focus, the creation of statistical problems, the formulation of researchable questions, and the validation of hypotheses are promoted. It was observed that, even though the students valued the model of reasoning, there were difficulties in the bivariate data analysis. However, the research strategy fostered a more active role, encouraging the elaboration of questions and argumentation based on the descriptive analysis of the data. The results show a positive attitude toward statistics and the analysis of real situations, suggesting the potential of this methodology to strengthen statistical reasoning in engineering contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: