This work demonstrates a new metric for similarity in counterfactual reasoning, suggesting its importance in modal logic and semantics.
Counterfactual reasoning is a foundational topic in both philosophical and logical studies {Stalnaker1968-STAATO-5, Lewis1973-LEWC-2}. A pivotal component of counterfactual analysis is the concept of similarity between possible worlds {CORR_A_2022, ESTEVA1997235, Lewis1979-LEWCDA, Makinson94, Pollock1976-POLTPW}. In this paper, we propose the introdutcion of a metric to quantify the degree of similarity between possible worlds, where two worlds are the more similar the longer they share a common history, drawing on a similarity framework influenced by {Lewis1979-LEWCDA}. We prove that this metric satisfies the properties of an ultra-metric, offering a mathematically robust foundation for a corresponding graded notion of hierarchical similarity. We develop and axiomatize a multi-modal logic of similarity, \( L_ε \), and demonstrate its soundness and completeness with respect to the class of ultra-metric spaces. Finally, we explore modal definability, establishing connections between ultra-metric semantics and the broader theory of counterfactuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marta Esteves (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: