Observational analysis shows ICDs reduce cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation, highlighting potential benefits.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Therefore, the effect of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may be greater in patients with AF. We examined the long-term effects of primary prevention ICD implantation vs. usual clinical care according to AF status in DANISH. Outcomes were analysed according to AF status at baseline (history and/or on enrollment ECG). The primary outcome was all-cause death, and secondary outcomes were cardiovascular and sudden cardiovascular death. Of the 1116 patients with non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction randomized in DANISH, 418 (37.5%) had AF at baseline, of whom 24.2% had paroxysmal AF, 17.0% persistent AF, and 58.9% permanent AF. AF status did not significantly modify the effect of ICD implantation on all-cause death, although there was a suggestion of a greater effect in patients with [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78 (95% CI, 0.59-1.03)] vs. without AF [HR 0.98 (0.75-1.27)] (Pinteraction = 0.15). AF status significantly modified the effect of ICD implantation on cardiovascular death, such that ICD implantation was associated with a lower rate of this outcome in patients with AF [HR 0.67 (0.48-0.94)], but not in those without AF [HR 1.04 (0.76-1.41)] (Pinteraction = 0.04). Although AF status did not significantly modify the effect of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death, there was a suggestion of a greater effect in patients with [HR 0.45 (0.24-0.82)] vs. without AF [HR 0.76 (0.41-1.38)] (Pinteraction = 0.20). In the DANISH trial, the presence of AF was associated with a greater effect of ICD implantation on cardiovascular death, and although similar trends were observed for all-cause and sudden cardiovascular death, the treatment-by-subgroup interaction was not statistically significant for these outcomes. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT00542945.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: