PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Multiple Sclerosis Journal2 citations

Differential results of genetic risk scoring for multiple sclerosis in European and African American populations

View Full Paper
CRCyprien RivierLXLeqi XuSCSantiago Clocchiatti‐Tuozzo

Key Points

  • Genetic risk scores stratified MS risk in European and Latino individuals, but not in African participants, indicating a need for improved methods.
  • The odds ratio for European ancestry was 2.30, while it was 2.53 for Latino/admixed participants, underscoring disparities in effectiveness across groups.
  • This cross-sectional analysis utilized data from 32,428 participants across three ancestry groups, emphasizing the importance of diverse genetic data.
  • Incorporating African-specific data with JointPRS improved GRS stratification in African ancestry, suggesting tailored approaches are essential.

Abstract

Background: Genetic risk scores (GRSs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) help identify high-risk individuals and stratify populations for clinical trials, but most are derived from European populations, raising questions about GRS accuracy in other ancestries. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether an MS GRS can stratify individuals of African and Latino/admixed ancestry and assess whether the JointPRS tool enhances GRS portability in African ancestry. Methods: In this cross-sectional study using All of Us (2018–2022), we derived a GRS from 232 variants for 32,428 European, 32,428 African, and 32,428 Latino/admixed participants, each divided into quintiles. The outcome was MS ascertained through International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) codes. JointPRS was used to improve GRS portability in the African-ancestry group. Results: MS prevalence was 1.0% in European, 0.56% in African, and 0.46% in Latino/admixed participants. The GRS stratified MS risk effectively in European (odds ratio (OR) = 2.30 (1.60–3.36); p -trend < 0.001) and Latino/admixed (OR = 2.53 (1.43–4.85); p -trend < 0.001) ancestry groups but did not significantly partition African participants (OR = 1.30 (0.88–1.95); p -trend = 0.17). After applying JointPRS, stratification in African ancestry improved (OR = 3.02 (1.00–8.95); p -trend = 0.007). Discussion: A GRS for MS stratified European and Latino/admixed individuals but not African ancestry. Incorporating African-specific data enhanced performance, underscoring the need for more ancestry-tailored GRS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rivier et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d913b24ddcf71ba560bf71https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251377607
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Applying a genetic risk score model to enhance prediction of future multiple sclerosis diagnosis at first presentation with optic neuritis2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Genome-wide Association Studies in Ancestrally Diverse Populations: Opportunities, Methods, Pitfalls, and Recommendations2019 · 867 citations
  3. 3Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility2019 · 1,466 citations
  4. 4Larger Genetic Differences Within Africans Than Between Africans and Eurasians2002 · 227 citations
  5. 5Multiple sclerosis – a review2018 · 2,162 citations