Qualitative analysis reveals challenges and success factors in assistive technology prioritization for low- and middle-income countries.
This study examines the experiences and lessons learned from six Sub-Saharan African countries in developing National Priority Assistive Products Lists (APLs) between 2020 and 2024, aiming to provide insights for improving assistive technology (AT) access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study employed qualitative descriptive methodology with a multi-faceted approach, including a comprehensive desktop review of documentation and publications, followed by semi-structured interviews and information review with key stakeholders (n = 9) from all six countries. Data analysis involved synthesising information to identify common themes, challenges, and best practices in APL development. Key findings include the importance of multi-stakeholder engagement, challenges in data availability, varied prioritisation frameworks, and the need for local context adaptation. Countries faced common barriers, such as limited funding and regulatory challenges, however also identified facilitators like government leadership and integration with existing health systems. The study highlights the complex nature of developing National APLs and emphasises the importance of inclusive stakeholder engagement, data-driven prioritisation, and integration within broader health system strengthening efforts. These insights can guide other countries in developing and implementing effective APLs, ultimately improving AT access and advancing disability rights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: