September 29, 2025Irish Theological Quarterly

Response to Thomas Finegan’s “An Unnoticed Body-Person Dualism: A Rejoinder to Lawler and Salzman”

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This response clarifies disagreements regarding body-person dualism within the context of same-sex civil unions.
It discusses the ethical implications presented by Finegan's rejoinder and critiques his arguments on morality.
The article references previous discussions in journals, specifically the Irish Theological Quarterly, enhancing the contextual analysis.
Key themes involve morality and dualism, raising broader questions about the ethics of civil unions in modern theology.

Implication

This brief response addresses Dr. Finegan's rejoinder on body-person dualism and morality in same-sex civil unions.

Abstract

This article is a brief response to Dr. Finegan’s recent rejoinder to an earlier exchange we had with him in Irish Theological Quarterly on the morality of same-sex civil unions.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Lawler et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68da58c9c1728099cfd10840 https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400251378757

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This brief response addresses Dr. Finegan's rejoinder on body-person dualism and morality in same-sex civil unions.

Abstract

This article is a brief response to Dr. Finegan’s recent rejoinder to an earlier exchange we had with him in Irish Theological Quarterly on the morality of same-sex civil unions.

Response to Thomas Finegan’s “An Unnoticed Body-Person Dualism: A Rejoinder to Lawler and Salzman”

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Response to Thomas Finegan’s “An Unnoticed Body-Person Dualism: A Rejoinder to Lawler and Salzman”

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading