Clustering analysis reveals insights into galaxy formation in BOSS-CMASS galaxies, suggesting potential improvements in halo occupation distribution modeling.
The spatial distribution and clustering property of massive and luminous galaxies have provided important constraints on the fundamental cosmological parameters and physical processes governing galaxy formation. In this work, we construct and compare independent galaxy-halo connection models in the application of clustering measurement at non-linear scales of BOSS-CMASS galaxies. In particular, we adopt a halo occupation distribution (HOD) model with 11 parameters and a semi-analytical model (SAM) with 16 parameters to describe the galaxy correlation function including the projected correlation function, redshift space monopole and quadrupole. We focus on the redshift space distortion effect caused by the galaxy peculiar velocity. With a empirical model for the velocity field and the emulator technique, we can explore the parameter space of both models. We find that the HOD model is able to recover the underlying velocity field of SAM with an accuracy of 3%, and can be improved to 1% when the analysis is restricted to scales above 1h⁻¹Mpc. The comparison is based on multiple samplings in the parameter space which can verify the convergence of the empirical and physical model for galaxy formation. Then we perform constraints on the model parameters using clustering measurement of CMASS galaxies. Although limited by the emulator accuracy and the flexibility of the model, we find that the clustering measurement is capable of constraining a subset of the SAM parameters, especially for components sensitive to the star formation rate. This result leads us to anticipate that a joint analysis of both clustering and abundance measurements can significantly constrain the parameters of galaxy formation physics, which requires further investigation from both theoretical and observational aspects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: