Clinical study compares nanofat with and without PRP for scar enhancement, showing significant benefits.
and poor suppleness. Regenerative therapy include nanofat, rich in stromal vascular fraction, and PRP, a concentration of autologous platelets releasing growth factors. The combination has been hypothesized to improve scar remodeling Objectives: To compare nanofat injection with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma(PRP) in improvement of mature scar. Patients and methods: This prospective, split-scar study at Qena University Hospital(August 2024–2025) included 15 adults with facial scars(>6 months old). The study was ethically approved under SVU-MED-SUR011-1-24-9-947. Each patient received nanofat on one half of the scar and nanofat+PRP on the other. Fat was harvested mainly from the abdomen, emulsified and filtered into nanofat; PRP was obtained by double centrifugation. Injections were superficial or subdermal, followed by standard wound care and medications. Scars were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and pain scores. Results: The nanofat + PRP group showed significantly lower POSAS scores at 1(34.67±4.71 vs. 41.87±6.28; p=0.0019), 3(25.2±3.66 vs. 31.27±6.48; p=0.0049), and 6 months(17.4±2.68 vs. 22.6±4.67; p=0.0012). VAS pain scores were also significantly lower at 3(3.6±0.95 vs. 5±0.89; p=0.0004) and 6 months(1.8±0.75 vs. 2.93±0.85; p=0.0009). VSS scores improved significantly at 3(p < 0.0001) and 6 months(p=0.0438). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher with the combination therapy(p=0.0086). Conclusion: Nanofat with PRP improves mature scar look, discomfort, and patient satisfaction more than nanofat alone without increasing side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdullah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: