Narrative synthesis reviews pain management strategies for combat injury, highlighting multimodal interventions and barriers in military care.
Background: Trauma incurred in ongoing conflicts, including blast trauma and polytrauma, has elevated chronic pain rates, with up to 60% of injured personnel, and is a factor in the heightened post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and reduced operational readiness. Ministry of Defense (MoD) healthcare systems face specific difficulties in the delivery of sophisticated pain care within austere environments. Aim: This review synthesizes 2020–2025 evidence on pain management strategies used by physicians and nurses in MoD settings for combat injury, with the intention to evaluate efficacy, identify barriers, and inform standardized protocols. Methods: A narrative synthesis of 46 peer-reviewed articles in PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL was conducted, prioritizing multimodal strategies (pharmacological, regional anesthesia, complementary integrative health [CIH], rehabilitation). Studies were evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (2020). Results: Multimodal therapies, including ketamine infusions (50–70% acute relief), peripheral nerve blocks (74% evacuation relief), and CIH (0.44 SD pain reduction), are more effective than unimodal methods. Nurse-physician teams enhance efficiency, but logistical challenges, opioid stigma, and resource disparities hinder implementation. Conclusion: Combined pain services reduce opioid dependence and improve outcomes, necessitating more training, tele-CIH expansion, and NATO collaboration to surmount challenges and deliver equitable care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mudhaya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: