Discussion highlights Dutch research evaluation, emphasizing the unique evaluation protocol and its implications.
Any conversation about research evaluation in the Netherlands has the risk of developing along this line. The Dutch way of evaluating academic research might not be unique, but it is certainly not common, nor fully understood. As a member of the working group for the monitoring and further development of the evaluation protocol – and as an employee of CWTS – let me provide insight and context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L. van Drooge (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: