Descriptive survey reveals improved nutritional intake in rural households from community gardening, suggesting economic benefits.
The study examined effects of community gardening on nutritional intake among rural households in Katsina State. A descriptive survey design was employed using multistage sampling procedure to select 360 rural household participants across three senatorial districts: Katsina Central (KC), Katsina North (KN), and Katsina South (KS). Data on respondents’ socioeconomic characteristics, cultivation patterns, benefits, nutritional changes, and constraints were collected using a structured questionnaire and interview schedule. Majority (43.9%) were middle-aged (30-44 years), males (63.3%) from large households (47.2%) size of >9 members with no formal education (43.9%). Staple crops like millet (96.4%), maize and beans (95.3%, and groundnut (92.5%) were highly cultivated. Leafy vegetables showed strong cultivation patterns (79.2%), while fruit cultivation remained minimal. Fresh food access (75.6%) and fitness (75.8%) emerged as primary benefits with majority (53.9%) experiencing high overall benefit levels. Significant nutritional improvements occurred across multiple food groups, with legumes and nuts (72.8%) showing the strongest positive effects followed by leafy vegetables (75.3%). Grains and root crops also demonstrated substantial improvements. Nutritional changes were distributed between high (48.6%) and medium (50.8%) improvement categories. Cost constraint dominated challenges (93.1%), followed by income limitations (91.7%), though 75.6% of participants experienced overall low constraint levels. Statistical analysis revealed significant district-level differences in involvement (F=44.74, p<0.001), benefits (F=37.10, p<0.001), nutritional changes (F=11.90, p<0.001), and constraints (F=422.24, p<0.001). Regression analysis identified involvement (β=0.102, p<0.01), benefits (β=0.102, p<0.05), and challenges (β=0.273, p<0.001) as significant predictors of nutritional improvements, with district-specific models explaining up to 50% of variation. Community gardening significantly enhances rural household nutritional intake, despite economic constraints. Government should develop programmes that should aim at addressing each district’s specific constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ojetola et al. (2025) studied this question.