Prospective study compares sedation-only anesthesia to sedation with local anesthesia in children, indicating safer outcomes.
Pediatric circumcision is a common procedure, and effective pain control is essential for recovery and comfort. The optimal anesthesia technique remains debated. To compare the efficacy and safety of sedation-only anesthesia versus sedation combined with local lidocaine infiltration anesthesia in children undergoing circumcision. In this prospective study, 140 boys aged 1-6 years were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous sedation alone (Group I) or sedation plus local anesthesia (Group II). Both groups received a standardized sedative regimen: midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, and ketamine. Postoperative pain was assessed at 1 and 3 hours using the FLACC scale. Complications were recorded. Median FLACC scores at both 1 hour (Group I: 2.0 [0-6], Group II: 2.0 [0-6]) and 3 hours (Group I: 1.0 [0-4], Group II: 1.0 [0-3]) showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). However, local complications such as ecchymosis and edema were more frequent in the group receiving local anesthesia (Group II: 7.1%) compared to the sedation-only group (Group I: 15.7%). Sedation-only anesthesia using midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, and ketamine provides effective postoperative pain control for pediatric circumcision, with fewer local complications than when combined with local infiltration anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdeş et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: