This method standardizes oral exams to improve assessment in upper-level physics and astronomy courses, suggesting a new approach for better student evaluation.
Oral exams were common historically across academia, though their popularity has recently fallen. Many argue against them as an assessment technique because they are vulnerable to bias and subjectivity, difficult to administer, and impractical in large college classes. I present a method for administering oral examinations in upper-level courses that mitigates some of the disadvantages. This method creates a rigid question structure meant to assess student mastery of material, have a well-defined grading structure to standardize evaluation, and be administered a constrained time limit to reduce workload in larger seminars. I emphasize holistic verbal communication and evaluation that is meant to mirror the talks and interviews that are common throughout a scientist's career.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brian DiGiorgio Zanger (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: