This paper demonstrates key implementation strategies for enhancing research transparency and accessibility in higher education, indicating pathways to effective adoption.
Open Science (OS) offers opportunities to increase research transparency, accessibility, and collaboration but widespread adoption in higher education remains limited. This paper presents a hypothesized causal pathway grounded in implementation science to guide OS adoption and sustainment among researchers. We describe key implementation strategies across individual, interpersonal, and organizational levels and illustrate their use through a case example from our College of Allied Health Sciences. Using a logic model framework, we detail inputs, activities, outputs and emerging outcomes. Lessons learned inform practical recommendations for integrating OS practices into academic research culture and infrastructure to support long-term, systemic change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rountrey et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: