Mixed-method design identifies sustainable conflict management options for land and water resources in Saku, suggesting capacity building is crucial.
Sustainable conflict management is vital as conflicts lead to loss of lives, forced displacement of people, loss of lives, livestock stolen, and widespread property destruction. In the Saku constituency, access to grazing land and water sources is a continuous cause of conflict. This study aimed to investigate sustainable conflict management options over land and water resources in Saku Constituency, Marsabit, Kenya. The study was guided by Paul Lederach's conflict transformation theory. Employing a mixed-method design, the study targeted a total population of 15,696 households, representing various stakeholders, such as community members, government officials, religious leaders, and civil society representatives. The study sample size was 375 households. Questionnaires and interviews were used for data collection, which was tested for reliability and validity prior to administration. The research quantitative data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whereas content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. For conflict management, the study identified measures such as enhanced capacity building on peace and conflict transformation, collaborative approaches, sustainable resource management practices, adequate access to information, and respecting the rights and interests of all parties. Thus, the study recommends measures on conflict prevention, including improved security patrols, interventions from the National Government, policymakers, and professionals in conflict management, and application of conflict management options, which include enhanced capacity building on peace and conflict transformation
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guracha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: