Analysis demonstrates solid-state defluorination/fluorination mechanisms in fluoride-ion battery cathodes.
Fluoride-ion batteries, which use fluoride ions as charge carriers, are potential candidates for surpassing conventional lithium-ion batteries. Iron fluoride (FeFx, x = 3–0) is a cathode material with a high theoretical capacity of 712 mAh g–1. However, its electrochemical properties and reaction mechanism remain largely unexplored. In this study, a FeFx thin film was fabricated to investigate its discharge/charge capability and defluorination/fluorination mechanism as a cathode for all-solid-state fluoride-ion batteries. At room temperature, the FeFx cathode exhibited a reversible capacity that is 88–72% of the theoretical value at current rates of 0.1–1C. In addition, the cathode demonstrated excellent cyclability without any overvoltage increase or capacity degradation. The FeFx cathode could be discharged/charged even at a very low temperature of −30 °C, suggesting that the activation energy required for defluorination/fluorination is low. Operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy quantitatively demonstrated that the reversible discharge/charge of the FeFx cathode at room temperature was due to defluorination/fluorination between FeF3, FeF2, and Fe. The scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results revealed that the electrode structure comprising uniformly distributed FeF3 fine grains approximately 10 nm in size was maintained throughout the discharge/charge cycle, suggesting that this nanometer-scale structure is related to the excellent cyclability of the FeFx cathode. Electrochemical analysis revealed that the defluorination/fluorination reaction of FeF2/Fe was rate-limited by the charge transfer process, indicating the kinetic advantage of the solid-state FeFx reaction. This study provides significant improvements in the practical properties of the fluoride-ion electrode and insights into solid-state defluorination/fluorination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: