This analysis reveals improved temperature forecasting accuracy in the Sierra Nevada, indicating better predictions for snowmelt and streamflow.
California relies on Sierra Nevada spring snowmelt for 60% of its water, serving 23 million people. Forecasting this snowmelt is vital for water supply planning and is a key task of the California Department of Water Resources’ Bulletin-120. Accurate predictions rely on subseasonal 2-m temperature (T2m) forecasts, especially at high elevations where snowpack and runoff contributions are greatest. Current systems like the California Nevada River Forecast Center’s (CNRFC) Hydrologic Ensemble Forecast Service (HEFS) have identified T2m forecasts as a key uncertainty source. However, research on fine-resolution subseasonal temperature forecasting in complex terrain is limited. This study uses the Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) dataset as ground truth and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) reforecasts to apply Analog Ensemble (AnEn) post-processing, producing high-resolution (4-km) daily T2m forecasts for the Sierra Nevada. We find that during the spring snowmelt season (AprilJuly), AnEn reduces T2m forecast rootmean-squared error by 1°C (60% for 1-day leads, 20% for 15-day leads), increases correlation by ~11%, extends skill by an additional week beyond dynamical benchmarks, and illustrates added value beyond a basic bias correction method (the Ensemble Model Output Statistics). Improvements are more pronounced at higher elevations (e.g., 3000–3500 m), with root-mean-squared error reduced by 4°C, correlation rising from 0.1 to 0.9, and skill extended by two weeks. By enhancing T2m accuracy for Bulletin-120 and CNRFC-HEFS systems, AnEn can boost the precision of snowmelt and streamflow predictions, supporting improved water resource management in a changing climate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: