Parameterizations of entrainment and detrainment rates were evaluated in shallow cumulus, revealing machine learning indicates better accuracy than conventional methods.
Accurate parameterizations of entrainment and detrainment rates ( ε and δ ) of shallow cumulus are crucial for improving simulations of atmospheric energy and water cycles. Existing ε and δ parameterizations are often derived from theoretical derivations, limited observations, or numerical simulations, which lack comprehensive global observational support. To address this limitation, parameterizations of shallow cumulus ε and δ are developed and evaluated using a global satellite‐derived data set. For parameterizations based on the physical approach, the recommended scheme incorporates environmental relative humidity (RH e ) and vertical velocity to parameterize ε , while δ is parameterized using ε and RH e . Furthermore, the machine learning (ML) approach trained on thermodynamic, dynamic, and cloud microphysical properties can accurately predict ε and δ . Comparative analysis reveals that ML performs better than the physical approach. These findings provide valuable insights for refining cumulus parameterizations and enhancing the accuracy of climate model simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: