This study demonstrates how variations in core spun yarn impact moisture management in cut protective fabric, suggesting enhancements in wearer comfort.
Purpose The ability of clothing to effectively transfer and evaporate moisture is a crucial and anticipated quality. Improved moisture management in clothing enhances wearer comfort. This study aims to investigate the impact of different high-performance core-spun yarn on the moisture management properties of cut protective fabric. Design/methodology/approach Stainless steel, high-performance polyethylene and polyester fibers were amalgamated using the core yarn spinning technique to improve the cut protection of clothing. Twelve fabric samples were made using a six-end satin weave and core-spun yarn with three different twist levels (500, 600 and 700 m−1) and varying core-sheath ratios. Yarn count, thread density and fabric weight remained consistent across all samples. According to AATCC 195-2011, the moisture management tester evaluated the parameters such as wetting duration, spreading rate, absorption speed, wetting radius, one-way transport capacity and overall moisture management ability of each sample. Findings Fabric made with a reduced amount of core ratio (stainless steel) and a lower yarn twist level, as well as lower bulk density, exhibited superior performance in terms of overall moisture management capacity, spreading speed, absorption rate, maximum wetted radius and one-way transport capacity. Originality/value This study offers a new perspective on the moisture management characteristics of cut protective fabrics made from high-performance core-spun yarns. While previous studies have mainly concentrated on the mechanical and protective properties of these textiles, this research delves into how variations in core-sheath ratios and twist levels affect the fabric’s moisture transfer and evaporation capabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: