Analysis of N-doped TiO2 structures reveals enhanced photocatalytic performance, highlighting optimal doping levels.
Lightly and heavily nitrogen (N)‐doped TiO 2 systems (LD‐TO and HD‐TO) were synthesized via ammonia (NH 3 ) gas‐assisted annealing at 450 and 750 °C. XRD patterns showed low‐ and high‐angle shifts for LD‐TO and HD‐TO, indicating lattice expansion (LD‐TO) and contraction in HD‐TO, with a Ti‐oxynitride (TiON) peak in HD‐TO indicating secondary phase segregation. FESEM analysis shows spherical particles (∼30 nm for TO) growing to ∼40–50 nm with a layered structure in doped samples. BET surface areas were 37.8, 41.8, and 27.1 m 2 /g for TO, LD‐TO, and HD‐TO, respectively. XPS confirmed Ti 4+ , O 2‐ , and N doping of ∼5.7% (LD‐TO) and 10.4% (HD‐TO). Optical analysis showed reduced band gaps (3.12 eV for LD‐TO, 3.02 eV for HD‐TO versus 3.21 eV for TO) and improved light absorption. Urbach energies (0.603 meV for LD‐TO; 0.926 meV for HD‐TO) reflected moderate defect density in LD‐TO. Electrochemical measurements indicated enhanced charge transfer, with LD‐TO outperforming HD‐TO in photocurrent response. LD‐TO degraded ∼98% rhodamine B in 150 min and produced H 2 at 935.2 µmol g −1 h −1 under sunlight, compared to 86% degradation and 765.4 µmol g −1 h −1 for HD‐TO. These results highlight that optimal N doping enhances TiO 2 ’s electronic, structural, and photocatalytic properties, while excessive doping leads to secondary phase formation and reduced performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravikumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: