Research reveals the interplay of health components in individuals, suggesting anthropocentric perspectives shape resilience.
The subject of the research is the phenomenon of health as a complex, multidimensional, and hierarchically organized system, including physical, mental, social, and spiritual components. The object of the research is the sociocultural standards of health that determine societal and personal representations of health and illness. The author examines aspects of the topic such as ancient, adaptive, and anthropocentric approaches to understanding health in detail. Special attention is given to the anthropocentric standard, within which the individual is perceived as a self-developing system capable of awareness, self-knowledge, spiritual growth, and internal integration. The research is based on a systemic-structural approach, which allows for the analysis of health as a dynamic process involving the interaction of different levels of human being. The annotation emphasizes the significance of the inner core of the individual as a key component that ensures the integrity and resilience of the individual. The methodological foundation of the research is the systemic-structural approach and the model of logical levels of consciousness by R. Dilts, complemented by elements of structural psychosomatics, allowing for the analysis of the internal organization of the individual through the lens of values, identity, and spiritual core. The scientific novelty of this research lies in the integration of the model of logical levels of consciousness into the interpretation of the anthropocentric standard of health, which provides a new perspective on the internal structure of the individual as a system. This approach offers the possibility for a deep analysis of the value-semantic foundations of human existence and the mechanisms of self-organization. The work emphasizes that health in the anthropocentric context acts as a result of stable interaction between various levels of the mental and spiritual organization of the individual. Unlike the ancient and adaptive standards, the proposed approach focuses on the inner core of the individual as a source of vital energy, existential meaning, and spiritual resilience. It is concluded that the disruption of the connection with the core of the individual is at the heart of many personal and psychosomatic crises. Restoring this connection contributes to achieving psychological integrity, personal maturity, internal balance, and high stress resilience, which opens new perspectives for both theoretical psychology and practical psychotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mariam Abdurrahman Mustafayeva (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: