Observational study correlates academic performance and GRE scores with student outcomes in physical therapy, suggesting key predictive factors.
BACKGROUND: The competitive nature of admissions to physical therapy programs necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the factors that predict student success. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pre- and post-admission variables and key indicators of success to improve the admission process and support student development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study reviewed pre- and post-admissions data from 319 students enrolled in the Bachelor of Science (BS)/Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program at SUNY Downstate between 2006 and 2019. Pre-admission metrics included cumulative grade point average (GPA), science GPA, prerequisite GPA, and graduate record examination (GRE) scores, while post-admission factors included final BS GPA, final DPT GPA, time to graduation, academic probation, and program dismissal. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to examine relationships between these variables. T-tests and Chi-square tests were used to assess differences between successful and unsuccessful students, and a logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive power of pre-admission metrics on student outcomes. RESULTS: The final BS GPA showed the strongest correlation with the final DPT GPA, indicating that academic performance in the first year of the BS/DPT program is a key predictor of success in the DPT portion of the curriculum. Quantitative GRE scores were higher among successful students, while the difference in pre-admission cumulative GPA (3.45 vs. 3.38, P = 0.05) approached significance. CONCLUSION: Pre-admission metrics such as cumulative GPA and quantitative GRE scores showed some predictive value, but student success was largely correlated with performance in the program’s first year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeOliveira et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: