Analysis quantifies climate impact on aviation, revealing changes in fuel consumption and emissions post-crisis.
Closures of the Russian and Ukrainian airspace following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 have influenced international air transport. Flights have to be re-routed leading to increases in mission distance, flight time, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. However, the climate impact of aviation is also significantly determined by non-CO2 effects which do not only depend on emission quantities but also emission location and time. Therefore, this paper aims to quantify the climate impact from Russian and Ukrainian airspace closures in context of the Ukrainian crisis. The analysis is built on open-source flight track data as provided by The OpenSky Network applied in the Integrated Trajectory Calculation Module. Climate impact evaluation is performed in a climatological approach using climate chemistry response model AirClim. The analysis confirms an increase in fuel consumption and CO2 effects for a mission-specific comparison of pre invasion and post invasion air traffic scenarios. By contrast, the climate impact from non-CO2 species decreases disproportionately leading to a slight reduction of the total climate impact. This is caused by changes in emission latitude and altitude. On a larger temporal scale, a comparison of annual pre and post invasion scenarios is also influenced by changes in flight plans and fleet composition. While airspace closures have significantly influenced aviation in terms of fuel consumption, flight time and operating cost leading to economic disadvantages, an environmental disadvantage regarding the climate impact of aviation cannot be confirmed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zengerling et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: