Observational analysis reveals no link between oral MPA and cerebral meningioma in public insurance patients, suggesting concerns for dMPA's prolonged use.
Background/Objectives: Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is a synthetic contraceptive that can be used orally or as a once-every-three-month injection (i.e., depot MPA [dMPA]). Prior research has reported an increased association between dMPA and cerebral meningioma but has been limited in generalizability to meningioma cases treated with surgery or cases derived from an administrative database of commercial insurance enrollees. The current study builds upon prior research by examining the association among public insurance enrollees utilizing both a non-active and active comparator. Methods: Utilizing Alabama Medicaid data, cases of cerebral meningioma were matched to up to ten controls based on age and year of Medicaid enrollment. A conditional logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between MPA and dMPA exposure and cerebral meningioma were compared to both an active and non-active comparator. Results: Among 469 cases and 4690 matched controls, there was no association between oral MPA and cerebral meningioma. Associations for dMPA exposure were similar when using a non-active (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.16–3.00) or active comparator (OR 1.93, 95% CI 01.01–3.69). These associations were strongest for prolonged exposure compared to a non-active (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.88–7.68) and active comparator (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.09–12.29). Conclusion: The current results are consistent with the prior literature that dMPA exposure is associated with an increased likelihood of meningioma for prolonged use. More research is needed to examine whether the association is limited to a certain histology or grade of meningioma. Clinicians should consider discussing with patients these reported associations prior to using dMPA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reynolds et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: