Observational study assesses antidepressant prescribing patterns and cost-effectiveness in patients with depression, highlighting generics' affordability.
Background: Depression is a major mental health condition worldwide that significantly impairs daily functioning and quality of life. Effective and rational use of antidepressant medications is essential for optimal outcomes and cost-effective healthcare delivery, particularly in resourcelimited settings. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prescribing patterns of antidepressants using WHO-CORE prescribing indicators and assess the cost-effectiveness of prescribed antidepressants through direct cost comparison of branded and generic formulations. Methodology: A hospital-based observational study was conducted among 217 patients diagnosed with depressive illness at the Psychiatry Outpatient Department of Santosh Hospital. Prescriptions were analyzed prospectively. Sociodemographic and drug-related data were collected using a structured proforma. Prescribing patterns were assessed with WHO-CORE indicators, and cost comparison was performed between branded and generic antidepressants. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine (32.72%) and citalopram (32.26%) were the most prescribed antidepressants. Overall, 60.6% of prescriptions included drugs listed in the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) 2022. Cost analysis showed that the mean cost of branded antidepressants (₹139.60 ± 86.38) was significantly higher than that of generics (₹33.13 ± 35.08), with a highly statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlights rational prescribing patterns aligned with WHO-CORE indicators and emphasizes the substantial cost advantage of generics over branded drugs. Promoting generic prescribing could enhance affordability and access to mental health treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navreet et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: