Observational analysis links NDVI to canopy dieback in Piñon-Juniper woodlands, suggesting effective remote sensing monitoring for drought-affected ecosystems.
Drought-induced forest mortality threatens biodiversity globally, particularly in arid, and semi-arid woodlands. The continual development of remote sensing approaches enables enhanced monitoring of forest health. Herein, we investigate the ability of a limited ground-truthed canopy dieback dataset and satellite image derived Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to make inferences about forest health as temporal and spatial extent from its collection increases. We used ground-truthed observations of relative canopy mortality from the Pinus edulis-Juniperus osteosperma woodlands of southeastern Utah, United States of America, collected after the 2017–2018 drought, and PlanetScope satellite imagery. Through assessing different modelling approaches, we found that NDVI is significantly associated with sitewide mean canopy dieback, with beta regression being the most optimal modelling framework due to the bounded nature of the variable relative canopy dieback. Model performance was further improved by incorporating the proportion of J. osteosperma as an interaction term, matching the reports of species-specific differential dieback. A time-series analysis revealed that NDVI retained its predictive power for our whole testing period; four years after the initial ground-truthing, thus enabling retrospective inference of defoliation and regreening. A spatial random forest model trained on our ground-truthed observations accurately predicted dieback across the broader landscape. These findings demonstrate that modest field campaigns combined with high-resolution satellite data can generate reliable, scalable insights into forest health, offering a cost-effective method for monitoring drought-impacted ecosystems under climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shayle et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: