Parameter optimization using Importance Sampling improves model accuracy in marine biogeochemistry, suggesting robust strategies for constraint.
The predictive accuracy of marine biogeochemical models is fundamentally limited by uncertainty in their parameter values. We present a parameter optimization framework using iterative Importance Sampling (iIS) to constrain the PISCES model by leveraging the rich, multi-variable dataset provided by Biogeochemical-Argo (BGC-Argo) floats. Using data from a BGC-Argo float in the North Atlantic, we assimilate a comprehensive suite of 20 biogeochemical metrics to constrain all 95 parameters of the PISCES model within a 1D vertical configuration. Our global sensitivity analysis (GSA) identifies parameters controlling zooplankton dynamics as the dominant source of model sensitivity for this specific site. We compare three strategies: (1) optimizing a subset of parameters for their strong direct influence (Main effects); (2) optimizing a larger subset that also includes parameters influential through non-linear interactions (Total effects); and (3) simultaneously optimizing all 95 parameters. All three approaches achieve a statistically indistinguishable and significant improvement in model skill, reducing Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) by 54–56 %. The rich, multi-variable dataset provides sufficient orthogonal constraints to yield posterior parameter distributions with negligible inter-correlation, shifting the long-standing challenge of correlated equifinality to uncorrelated equifinality, where a range of optimal parameter sets can be found independently. Parameter uncertainty is reduced by 16–41 %, and the optimized ensembles demonstrate strong portability. While all strategies produce a similar, tightly constrained predictive spread for the assimilated variables, they differ significantly in computational cost and in their estimation of uncertainty for unobserved parts of the model. The prerequisite GSA was ~40 times more computationally expensive than the optimization, while the All-parameters strategy, by exploring the full parameter space, provides a more comprehensive and robust quantification of the model's uncertainty in unassimilated variables. We therefore conclude that directly optimizing all model parameters is the recommended strategy. This work delivers a validated, parameter set for the North Atlantic and demonstrates a scalable framework to advance biogeochemical modeling from using static, globally-uniform parametrization to developing a map of regionally-tuned parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyvernat et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: