Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives show effective α-amylase inhibition in-vitro, suggesting potential for diabetes management.
Background: 1,3,4-Thiadiazole derivatives have garnered interest due to their wide range of pharmacological activities, including potential as α-amylase inhibitors for managing diabetes. This study aimed to synthesize novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives, evaluate their in-vitro α-amylase inhibitory activity, and analyze their pharmacokinetic and drug-likeness properties. Methods: The derivatives were synthesized via a multi-step process involving the reaction of thiosemicarbazide with various substituted anilines and formaldehyde, followed by condensation with 4H-chromen-3-carbaldehyde. The synthesized compounds were characterized by FTIR, ¹H NMR, and melting point analysis. Molecular docking studies were performed to assess binding affinity with α-amylase, while in-vitro α-amylase inhibitory activity was evaluated using various concentrations (10-100 µg/mL). Pharmacokinetic properties and in-silico toxicity were analyzed for drug-likeness assessment. Results: All synthesized compounds showed moderate to high yields (67-93%) and were confirmed by spectral data. Molecular docking indicated that compound A8 had the strongest binding affinity with a docking score of -9.5 kcal/mol. In-vitro α-amylase inhibition studies revealed that A8 exhibited the highest inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 44.67 µg/mL, surpassing the standard Acarbose (IC50: 60.51 µg/mL). Most compounds displayed favorable pharmacokinetic properties, including high gastrointestinal absorption and minimal blood-brain barrier permeation. Conclusion: The novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives, particularly A8, demonstrated significant potential as α-amylase inhibitors, showing strong binding affinity, effective enzyme inhibition, and promising pharmacokinetic profiles. These findings suggest that A8 could serve as a lead compound for further development in diabetes treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: