This analysis identifies concentrations of strategic elements in bottom ash, indicating their geochemical behaviour in a thermal power plant environment.
This study investigates the concentrations and geochemical behaviour of strategic elements—including Li, Co, Ni, Cu, Ga, Ge, rare earth elements (REEs), and yttrium (Y)—in bottom ash samples from the Afşin–Elbistan thermal power plant, Türkiye. Thirty bottom ash samples were analysed, revealing average ∑LREE and ∑HREE concentrations of 86.3 µg/g and 3.3 µg/g, respectively, resulting in an L/H ratio of 24.9, indicating pronounced enrichment in light REEs. The total ∑REE + Y concentration (111 µg/g) is comparable to the background value for coal but approximately 1.5 times lower than those reported for average Chinese coals and the upper continental crust (UCC). REE contents significantly exceed those of sedimentary (5.36 µg/g), mafic (16.77 µg/g), and felsic (3.60 µg/g) rocks. Elevated Li (30.5 µg/g) and Ni (114.4 µg/g) concentrations point to a mafic magmatic source, whereas Cu (28.7 µg/g) likely originates from basic volcanic rocks such as those of the Dağlıca Complex and the Kemaliye Formation. Chondrite-normalised REE patterns show Dy depletion relative to mafic rocks and Ho depletion compared to sedimentary rocks. Positive δEu anomalies (>1) support a mafic or UCC provenance, while slightly positive δCe values indicate hydrothermal leaching influences. The co-precipitation of Ce with Ca–Mg hydroxides and clay minerals in coal-bearing lacustrine sediments is suggested. Ga enrichment is attributed to aluminium-rich clay minerals and organic matter. Overall, these geochemical signatures reflect combined inputs from hydrothermal leaching and volcanic weathering within a coal-bearing lacustrine environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalender et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: