Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis compares infection resolution in children receiving surgical versus non-surgical treatment for chronic osteomyelitis, indicating better outcomes with surgery.
Background: Chronic osteomyelitis in children remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. Surgical debridement is considered the cornerstone of treatment, yet conservative antibiotic-only protocols are sometimes attempted when resources are constrained. Objective: To compare functional outcomes of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for pediatric chronic osteomyelitis of the lower limbs. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Kanti Devi Medical College Hospital and Research Center from January to December 2024. Fifty children (mean age 8 years) were included: 25 underwent surgical debridement with antibiotics, while 25 received antibiotics alone. Outcomes analyzed were infection resolution, recurrence, limb length discrepancy (LLD), range of motion (ROM), and school attendance. Results: Surgical management resulted in higher infection resolution (92% vs. 72%), lower recurrence (8% vs. 28%), and fewer functional restrictions compared to non-surgical treatment. These findings align with published literature, including Wirbel & Hermans (2014) and Disch et al. (2023). Conclusion: Surgical debridement combined with antibiotic therapy provides superior infection control and functional outcomes compared to conservative treatment alone in children with chronic osteomyelitis of the lower limbs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: