PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Frontiers in Medicine12 citationsOpen Access

Faculty perspectives on artificial intelligence’s adoption in the health sciences education: a multicentre survey

View Full Paper
EZEidan M. Al ZahraniSESalah H. ElsafiLMLenah D. Al Musallam

Key Points

  • Overall knowledge about artificial intelligence among faculty averaged 58.9%, indicating moderate understanding.
  • Positive perception rates of AI applications in education were high, averaging 74.8% across all participating faculty.
  • Despite the supportive views, only 33.7% felt AI outputs were reliable and accurate, revealing skepticism.
  • The integration of AI in medical education faces challenges like knowledge gaps, a shortage of skilled faculty, and ethical concerns.

Abstract

Introduction The integration of artificial intelligence technology into healthcare education has been hampered by a number of difficulties. This study aimed to investigate the faculty’s familiarity and perception towards AI applications in medical education concerning various demographic and professional characteristics. Methods This observational study used a validated questionnaire distributed to health sciences colleges’ faculty in Saudi Arabia from January 1 to April 30, 2025. Results Knowledge rates among the 293 participating faculty were moderate across all groups with an overall average of 58.9%. Knowledge varied significantly with increasing years of experience and academic qualification ( p = 0.000). In general, positive perception rates were generally high across all groups, with an overall average of 74.8%. Only 33.7% reported agreement on the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated outputs. A large proportion of the participants (72.3%) reported disagreement that AI use poses ethical concerns in medical education. Faculty opinions on the impact of AI on academic integrity varied. Discussion This study shows that there are still significant gaps in general knowledge, formal training, and ethical understanding, despite the supportive perception score of the health science faculty towards AI integration in medical education. Despite a general lack of knowledge and a lack of curricular content on AI applications, the results show considerable support for incorporating AI into medical education. Institutional readiness for the integration of AI in medical education is strongly influenced by obstacles, including a lack of knowledge, a shortage of skilled faculty, and fear of career threat.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zahrani et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc26268a7d58c25ebb32dehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1663741
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ethical Considerations and Fundamental Principles of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Viewpoint2024 · 88 citations
  2. 2ChatGPT as a Tool for Medical Education and Clinical Decision-Making on the Wards: Case Study2024 · 58 citations
  3. 3Artificial intelligence empowering public health education: prospects and challenges2024 · 57 citations
  4. 4Motor Unit Number Estimation for Evaluating Disease Progression and Comparison With Functional Rating Scale Scores in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Challenges of implementing computer-aided diagnostic models for neuroimages in a clinical setting2023 · 51 citations