Observational study compares two versus three weekly plyometric training sessions on strength and performance in jump athletes, indicating DOMS may affect outcomes.
Objective To compare the short-term effects of two versus three weekly PT sessions on strength and jump performance in competitive jumpers, and to examine associations between delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and week-to-week performance changes. Methods Thirty-nine male regional-level high and long jump athletes (17–23 years) completed a 4-week non-randomized observational cohort study. In Week 1 all performed two PT sessions; from Week 2, athletes continued with either two sessions per week (n = 19) or increased to three (n = 20). In Week 4, both groups reduced to two weekly sessions as part of a taper, such that Week-4 outcomes reflect shared recovery rather than continued frequency differences. Assessments at baseline and Weeks 1–4 included isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), and standing long jump (SLJ). DOMS was recorded weekly. Mixed-design ANOVAs tested group × time effects, and participant-level correlations examined DOMS associations with performance changes. Results Significant main effects of time were found for IMTP, SLJ, CMJ, and SJ (all p < 0.001). The 2×/week group showed steady improvements in IMTP and SLJ, while the 3×/week group experienced early decrements during intensified loading, followed by recovery in Week 4 during the taper phase. Participant-level analyses revealed significant negative correlations between DOMS and ΔIMTP (r = −0.38, 95% CI [–0.53, −0.21]) and ΔSLJ (r = −0.63, 95% CI [–0.73, −0.50]); weaker associations were observed for ΔCMJ (r = −0.21, 95% CI [–0.37, −0.03]) but not for ΔSJ. Conclusion Training twice weekly promoted more consistent gains, while three weekly sessions induced transient impairments linked to higher DOMS. Week-4 convergence reflected taper-related recovery rather than sustained frequency effects. Monitoring soreness may help coaches optimize load and recovery in jump athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: