Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 30, 2025Research Horizon

Comparative Analysis of Doxing Regulations and Privacy Protection in Indonesia and Global Perspectives

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MRMuhamad RizkyFHFauzie Muhammad HamdaniHAHappy Yulia Anggraeni

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative analysis explores doxing regulations in Indonesia and the EU, indicating legal gaps in privacy protection.

Key Points

  • Doxing poses a serious risk to privacy rights, especially in countries with limited legal protection.
  • In Indonesia, current laws do not specifically define doxing, leading to challenges in prosecuting offenders.
  • The EU's General Data Protection Regulation offers broad protections and severe penalties for privacy violations.
  • Recommendations include updating regulations to define doxing clearly and improving public digital literacy.

Cite This Study

Rizky et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc262a8a7d58c25ebb345fhttps://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.4.2025.728
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1DOXING AS A DIGITAL CRIME: A HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVACY PROTECTION PERSPECTIVE UNDER INDONESIAN LAW2025
  2. 2Doxing Actions in Personal Data Protection2025
  3. 3Guarding Privacy in the Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis of Data Protection Strategies in Indonesia and France2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4The Legal Protection of Personal Data in the Digital Era: A Comparative Study of Indonesian Law and the GDPR2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Personal Data Protection Analysis : Comparison of Indonesia, the United States as Federal Countries2025 · 1 citations