This observation reveals that blog posts, when cited, may hold the status of articles in Google Scholar, suggesting potential issues in digital preservation and peer review standards.
When checking out my Google Scholar profile today, I noticed that, if a blog post is cited, it will be counted as an article by Google Scholar. This is interesting for several perhaps conflicting reasons: These items are (often) not digitally preserved and have unstable URLs These items are not peer reviewed (does this matter?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: