Analysis reveals how tuition fees affect research output in universities, suggesting a link between teaching and publication dynamics.
If you think carefully about research publication and its economics, a strange (but also obvious) point becomes clear. In university ecosystems where we have tuition fees (and probably in those without) we determine how much material can be published through the frame of reference of teaching. This can be seen if you accept that research in the academy serves the dual function of dissemination _and_ assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: