⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

January 22, 2016Open Access

Ph.D. criterion: to 'merit publication'

Martin Paul Eve

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The criterion for awarding a Ph.D. includes the necessity for publication in scholarly communications, indicating a shift in academic expectations.
Attending the official training course allowed for a better understanding of the regulations at the University of London and the role of independent viva chairs.
The importance of being familiar with examination procedures was emphasized during the training course with practical insights shared by experienced examiners.
Reflecting on the evolving landscape of scholarly communications, the criteria for Ph.D. publication merit raise questions about academic standards.

Implication

Discussion on Ph.D. criteria for publication in academia, highlighting viva regulations and examiner roles.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Martin Paul Eve (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc27558a7d58c25ebb3a1a https://doi.org/10.59348/x6jwt-f9d76

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Thinking about UK Ph.D. examinations2021
2The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?2024 · 5 citations
3What examiners emphasize in their assessment of doctoral theses. Scoping reviewNarrative Review · 2026
4Evaluation Practices of Doctoral Examination Committees: Boundary-Work Under Pressure2024 · 6 citations
5Supporting Doctoral Candidates through Completion and Final Examination2024 · 3 citations