This critique highlights flaws in Ithaka S+R’s report on scholarly communications, suggesting it presents an exclusionary and insular vision.
I have read, with some dismay, the draft of [Ithaka S+R's most recent report](https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/draft-report-for-community-input/). I offer here some critical remarks that I hope will allow for revision of the work, which I believe offers an insular, digital-nationalist, exclusionary vision for the future of scholarly communications. The views herein are my personal take, not those of any organization for which I work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: