Assessment highlights the importance of quality metadata in scholarly communication, suggesting better transparency.
At Crossref, we care a lot about the completeness and quality of metadata. Gathering robust metadata from across the global network of scholarly communication is essential for effective co-creation of the research nexus and making the inner workings of academia traceable and transparent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korzec et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: