Gene editing of AEBP1 improves anti-PD-1 efficacy in tumors with cancer-associated fibroblasts, suggesting new strategies for treatment resistance.
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) that promote tumor progression either directly through tumor-CAF interactions or indirectly by influencing tumor infiltrating immune cells, thereby creating an immunosuppressive TME. High stromal signatures have been associated with reduced therapeutic efficacy and resistance to immune checkpoint blockades. AEBP1 is predominantly expressed in myofibroblasts, and its expression is further increased in CAFs that produce the extracellular matrix (ECM). It has two isoforms: the extracellular isoform binds to collagen and promotes collagen remodeling, while the intracellular isoform modulates transcription and signaling. We observed the expression of both isoforms in primary human CAFs. Our data showed that combined knockout of both AEBP1 isoforms via gene editing decreased CAF proliferation, collagen gel contractility, and CAF-mediated tumor cell proliferation in vitro. AEBP1 knockout mouse fibroblasts demonstrated reduced activity in both in vitro assays and in vivo within a co-implantation mouse model. RNA Sequencing revealed that AEBP1 knockout downregulated the collagen biosynthesis and ECM organization-related pathways in mouse fibroblasts and human CAFs. Importantly, AEBP1 loss in fibroblasts led to significant alterations in tumor cell phenotypes, including a marked reduction of tumor cells exhibiting an epithelial-mesenchymal transition signature in vivo. Furthermore, AEBP1 knockout in CAFs enhanced the anti-PD-1-induced effector T cell function and the anti-PD-1 efficacy. Our findings indicate that AEBP1 plays a crucial role in regulating the function of CAFs within the TME. Targeting AEBP1 could be a promising strategy to inhibit the tumor-promoting activities of CAFs and to overcome resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Natarajan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: