Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis shows laparoscopic appendicectomy reduces pain and recovery time in acute appendicitis patients, suggesting improved patient outcomes.
Background: Appendicectomy is the most common emergency abdominal surgery. Both open and laparoscopic approaches are practiced, yet debate continues regarding operative time, postoperative recovery, complications, and cost-effectiveness. Objectives: To compare open and laparoscopic appendicectomy with respect to operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, complications, and return to normal activity. Methods: Aprospective comparative study was conducted on 66 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis at R.N.T. Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan. Patients were randomized to either open appendicectomy (n=33) or laparoscopic appendicectomy (n=33). Data were analyzed using SPSS; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mean operative time was lower in laparoscopic group (29.7 ± 3.9 min) vs open (43.3 ± 6.0 min, p<0.001). Postoperative pain score (VAS) was significantly lower in LA (1.36 ± 0.48) compared to OA (3.24 ± 0.81, p<0.001). Hospital stay was shorter in LA (2.0 ± 0.68 vs 2.8 ± 0.77 days, p<0.001). Wound infection was significantly higher in OA (28% vs 3%, p<0.05). Return to work was earlier in LA(8.7 ± 2.8 vs 11.3 ± 6.4 days, p=0.007). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendicectomy offers benefits of reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications, and earlier recovery, though OAremains cost-effective. Choice should be individualized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: