Experimental analysis reveals wetting dynamics of falling film flow across various tube diameters and spacings.
The wettability of falling film flow outside multi-row horizontal tubes is a core factor determining the heat and mass transfer performance of falling film heat exchangers, which is critical for their optimized design and stable operation. A visualization experimental platform for falling film flow over ten rows of horizontal tubes was constructed, with water as the working fluid. High-definition imaging technology and image processing methods were employed to systematically investigate the liquid film distribution and wettability under three tube diameters (d = 0.016, 0.019, 0.025 m), four tube spacings (s = 0.75d, 1d, 1.25d, 1.5d), and four inter-tube flow patterns (droplet, columnar, column-sheet, and sheet flow). Two parameters, namely the “total wetting length” and the “total wetting area”, were proposed and defined. The distribution characteristics of the wetting ratio for each row of tubes were analyzed, along with the variation laws of the total wetting area of the ten rows of tubes with respect to tube diameter, tube spacing, and liquid film Reynolds number (Rel). The following results were indicated: (1) Increasing the fluid flow rate and the tube spacing both promote the growth of the wetting length. When Rel ≤ 505, with the increase of tube diameter, the percentage of the wetting length of the tenth tube row relative to that of the first tube row decreases under the same fluid flow rate; when Rel > 505, this percentage first decreases and then increases. (2) The total wetting area exhibits a trend of “first increasing then decreasing” or “continuous increasing” with the tube spacing, and the optimal tube spacing varies by flow pattern: s/d = 1 for droplet flow (d ≤ 0.016 m), s/d = 1.25 for columnar flow, and s/d = 1.25 (0.016 m), 1 (0.019 m), 1.5 (0.025 m) for sheet flow. (3) The effect of tube diameter on the total wetting area is a balance between the inhibitory effect (reduced inter-tube fluid dynamic potential energy) and promotional effect (thinner liquid film spreading). The optimal tube diameter is 0.016 m for droplet flow and 0.025 m for columnar/sheet flow (at s/d = 1.25). (4) The wetting performance follows the order 0.016 m > 0.025 m > 0.019 m when Rel > 505, and 0.025 m > 0.019 m > 0.016 m when Rel ≤ 505. Finally, an experimental correlation formula for the wetting ratio considering the Rel, the tube diameter, and tube spacing was fitted. Comparisons with the present experimental data, the literature simulation results, and the literature experimental data showed average errors of ≤10%, ≤8%, and ≤14%, respectively, indicating high prediction accuracy. This study provides quantitative data and theoretical support for the structural optimization and operation control of multi-row horizontal tube falling film heat exchangers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: