Observational analysis reveals that fractions from sea buckthorn seeds modulate platelet response, suggesting possible CVD benefits.
Background: Given the pivotal role of diet in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), there is a growing demand for new sources of bioactive phytochemicals that can contribute to CVD prevention and treatment. Previous research has unveiled the cardioprotective properties of several parts of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). For example, various fractions isolated from raw and roasted sea buckthorn seeds showed antioxidant properties in vitro. In addition, the serotonin-rich fraction obtained from roasted seed extract had the strongest antioxidant activity. However, it was unclear which chemical constituents contribute to the anti-platelet potential of sea buckthorn seeds. Methods: The anti-platelet activity of two fractions (fraction b and fraction c) from raw sea buckthorn seed extract, two fractions (fraction d and fraction g) from roasted sea buckthorn seed extract, and two chemical compounds—isorhamnetin 3-O-β-glucoside-7-O-α-rhamnoside (a major component of fraction b), and serotonin (5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine), present in fraction c was estimated in several in vitro assays. Results: Isorhamnetin 3-O-β-glucoside-7-O-α-rhamnoside significantly inhibited platelet activation. It lowered the exposition of the active form of GPIIb/IIIa on the surface of 20 μM ADP-stimulated platelets by about 26%. It also inhibited the exposition of P-selectin on the surface of 10 and 20 μM ADP-stimulated platelets. In addition, isorhamnetin 3-O-β-glucoside-7-O-α-rhamnoside (at 50 µg/mL) significantly prolonged the time of thrombus formation. The results also indicate that fractions d and g (from roasted seeds) are more effective anti-adhesive factors than fractions from raw sea buckthorn seeds. Conclusions: It can be suggested that sea buckthorn seeds can serve as a new source of anti-platelet compounds (especially derivatives of isorhamnetin) beneficial in CVD prevention and treatment; however, in vivo research is needed to clarify their mechanism of action, physiologically relevant concentrations, and therapeutic potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sławińska et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: