Qualitative analysis reveals healthcare professionals' acceptance and usability of the SARA robot in long-term care, suggesting potential benefits for patient interaction.
To explore the user experiences of healthcare professionals working with Social & Autonomous Robotic Health Assistant (SARA), a humanoid social robot, in long-term care (LTC) for people with dementia and people with intellectual disabilities (IDs). Secondarily, barriers to and facilitators for the implementation of SARA in LTC were identified. Lastly, the usability of the robot was explored. A qualitative design using semi-structured interviews. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to explore the usability of the robot. Seven healthcare professionals from 2 Dutch LTC organizations (one for dementia care and one for ID care) participated. Online semi-structured interviews were conducted. The SUS was completed online before the interview. Data were analyzed thematically using both an inductive and deductive approach. Three themes were identified: 1) acceptance of SARA by all involved, 2) impact of SARA on all involved, and 3) user-friendliness. The acceptance of SARA among healthcare professionals grew over time. SARA may enhance job satisfaction and enjoyment. The reported impact on residents was predominantly positive. The few negative effects were seen when offered activities did not match the situation or the resident's needs. Although implementation required a time investment, healthcare professionals saw the potential of SARA to save time. Barriers to and facilitators for the implementation of SARA were identified: adequate education about working with SARA, high motivation among staff, and support from the supplier were reported as the most important facilitators. The usability was considered marginally acceptable. Participants provided recommendations to further improve SARA. The user experiences with SARA were predominantly positive, making the robot a promising aid for healthcare professionals in delivering high-quality, personalized care in LTC. Quantitative studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of SARA. The usability of the robot may be improved by adhering to the recommendations when upgrading SARA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuurbier et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: