PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing4 citationsOpen Access

Contrastive Retrieval Methodology for Turkish Metaphor Detection and Identification

View Full Paper
EİEmrah İnan

Key Points

  • The retrieval-based contrastive learning method excels at identifying metaphorical expressions in Turkish texts.
  • The model achieved a Recall@10 score of 0.614 using the Turkish-e5-Large model in metaphor detection.
  • For metaphor identification, the highest Recall@10 score of 0.9739 was achieved with the SimCSE-TR-Contr-Sample-Meaning model.
  • These results highlight the model's ability to generalize and perform well in real-world scenarios with a competitive R@10 score of 0.8684.

Abstract

Metaphorical expressions, as a form of figurative language, are individually limited in their use. However, when both literal and non-literal meanings are considered, they are frequently used in web content. Hence, producing a balanced dataset to learn superior representations is a challenging task, and metaphor detection suffers from a limited training dataset. To alleviate this problem, we present a retrieval-based contrastive learning approach which first identifies candidate metaphors in the input text and then detects metaphorical expressions as a claim verification task in the inherently unbalanced setting of this study. Furthermore, we adapt contrastive learning to make it easier to distinguish between the literal and figurative meanings of the same expression. For the experimental setup, we extract non-literal and literal expressions along with their meanings and sample sentences from a Turkish dictionary. In the metaphor detection subtask, performance evaluation shows that sparse and dense search variations using the Turkish-e5-Large model achieve a Recall@10 (R@10) score of 0.614. Moreover, the SimCSE-TR-Contr-Sample-Meaning model achieves the highest Recall@10 (R@10) of 0.9739 on the generated test dataset for the metaphor identification subtask. In the real-world scenario, it achieves a competitive R@10 score of 0.8684, and these results clearly demonstrate that our model can generalise to this real-world scenario.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Emrah İnan (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd89e6fe798ba2fc498064https://doi.org/10.1145/3770072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages2020 · 1,469 citations
  2. 2Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics2020 · 1,422 citations
  3. 3Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing2020 · 30 citations
  4. 4Proceedings of the Fourth BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP2021 · 11 citations
  5. 5Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics2019 · 2,391 citations