This study reveals functionalization efficiency of organic and inorganic waste with APTMS and PEI, suggesting improvements for adsorbent applications.
Waste materials have emerged as attractive low-cost feedstocks for adsorbent development in environmental remediation and materials engineering. Organic wastes are particularly rich in cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin, which provide reactive oxygenated groups such as hydroxyls and carboxyls. While inorganic wastes offer stability, lower water retention makes them promising candidates. This study explores the functionalization of waste-derived organic and inorganic matrices using two amine-based agents: 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) and polyethylenimine (PEI). The materials were categorized as organic (orange peel, corn cob) or inorganic (silica gel, eggshell) and subjected to a pretreatment process involving drying, grinding, and sieving; inorganic substrates additionally underwent acid activation with citric acid. Surface modification was carried out in ethanolic (APTMS) or aqueous (PEI) media. To assess their suitability and processability as particulate sorbents, drying kinetics, physicochemical properties (FTIR, ζ-potential, pH, conductivity, Boehm titration), and flow characteristics (Carr and Hausner indices) were evaluated. The findings enable a comparative analysis of the functionalization efficiency and elucidate the relationship between substrate type (organic vs. inorganic) and its performance as a modified adsorbent. This approach advances the development of novel sorbent matrices for greenhouse gas mitigation while reinforcing circular economy principles through the valorization of low-cost, readily available waste materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peña‐Juarez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: