This evaluation method quantifies jamming effectiveness in SAR images, suggesting improvements for detection strategies.
The evaluation of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) jamming effectiveness is a primary means to measure the reliability of jamming effects, and it can provide important guidance for the selection of jamming strategies and application of jamming styles. To address problems in traditional evaluation methods for SAR scene deception jamming, namely the simple adoption of native feature parameters, incomprehensive integration for evaluation indicator design, and the inconsideration of resulting jamming detection effects, this paper proposes a SAR scene deceptive jamming evaluation method oriented to jamming detection. First, four profound feature parameters including the brightness change gradient, texture direction contrast degree, edge matching degree, and noise suppression difference index are extracted in terms of visual and non-visual manners, which accurately highlight the differences between jamming and the background. Subsequently, through nonlinear iterative optimization and loss function design, a comprehensive evaluation indicator, i.e., with a convex decomposition is proposed, which can effectively quantify the contribution of each feature parameter and distinguish the differences in jamming concealment under different scenes. Finally, based on the measured and simulated MiniSAR datasets of urban, mountainous, and other complex scenes, a mapping correlation between the SDD and jamming detection rate is established. The evaluation results show that when the SDD is less than 0.4, the jamming is undetectable; when the SDD is greater than 0.4, for every 0.1 increase in the SDD, the jamming detection rate decreases by approximately 0.1. This provides support for the quantification of jamming effects in terms of detection rate in real applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: