BackgroundChildhood internalizing and externalizing behavior problems predict poor long-term mental health outcomes. Parenting is a key risk factor, yet prior research often focuses narrowly on single behaviors, overlooking how broader patterns of parenting that consider multiple behaviors (i.e., involvement, warmth, inconsistency, monitoring, and punishment) interact with parent/family characteristics to predict internalizing and externalizing. MethodsUsing data from the ABCD Study, we conducted latent profile analysis (LPA) using six parenting behaviors (involvement, positive parenting, inconsistent discipline, poor monitoring and supervision, corporal punishment, other punishment) to identify broad parenting patterns. Logistic regression models tested differences between profiles by parent/family characteristics. Linear regression models predicted youth internalizing and externalizing from parenting profile, parent psychopathology, and family characteristics across late childhood and early adolescence. ResultsLPA identified three parenting profiles (entropy 0.956-0.994). Profile 1 was characterized by the lowest involvement, warmth, and monitoring and the highest punishment and inconsistency; Profile 2 by moderate levels; and Profile 3 by the highest involvement, warmth, and monitoring and the lowest punishment and inconsistency. Profiles 1 and 2 were associated with higher parental psychopathology and poorer family environments. Regression models indicated that youth externalizing differed by parenting profile in childhood but not adolescence. Parent/family factors outside of parenting were the most robust predictors of youth behavior. ConclusionsFindings underscore the importance of the broader familial context when addressing youth behavior problems and suggest interventions may be more effective when tailored to these contextual factors.
Webster et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: