PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy3 citationsOpen Access

Postoperative atrial fibrillation and stroke after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JDJacopo DonatiDMDoralisa MorroneFVFreek W.A. Verheugt

Key Points

  • Stroke risk is significantly higher in patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to those without it, increasing by three times on average.
  • The reported incidence of stroke varies widely from 0.4% to 16.7% within one year after non-cardiac surgery, depending on surgical type and patient factors.
  • The meta-analysis included 19 studies, with most showing increased stroke risk in the postoperative atrial fibrillation group versus no-atrial fibrillation group.
  • Proper monitoring for postoperative atrial fibrillation is essential during hospitalization, indicating a need for further studies on monitoring duration and methods.

Abstract

Abstract Background Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common after non-cardiac surgery. Because often transient, there are uncertainties on the associated risk of stroke, possibly driving the need for long-term anticoagulation. Methods We performed a systematic PubMed search until January 16th, 2025, related to the incidence of stroke in patients with POAF after non-cardiac surgery. We included papers reporting outcomes, excluding studies only dealing with epidemiology, mechanisms, management and treatment. We excluded studies reporting on POAF after cardiac surgery. Risk of bias was assessed for each study, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE methodology. Results We retrieved and included 40 studies (including review papers) for the systematic review. These were then further selected to create a final list of 19 studies included in the meta-analysis. The reported incidence of stroke after POAF was found to be widely variable, ranging between 0.4% and 16.7% at 1 year. Stroke incidence also varies widely according to the type of surgery and patient characteristics. With only three exceptions, all studies, however, reported a risk of stroke higher in the POAF group than in the no-POAF group, with a mean Odds Ratio (OR) of 3.02. Conclusions POAF on average triples the risk of stroke, with variations related to patient characteristics and type of surgery. Patients after non-cardiac surgery should be monitored at least during hospitalization to detect POAF. Future studies are necessary to evaluate optimal duration and modalities of monitoring, as well as to assess the relevance of symptomatic vs asymptomatic AF episodes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Donati et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91cbfe798ba2fc4989b6https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Postoperative atrial fibrillation and stroke—is it time to act?2014 · 3 citations
  2. 2Stroke outcomes in patients with new onset perioperative atrial fibrillation complicating major abdominal surgery compared with patients with new onset non-perioperative atrial fibrillation2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Controversies in postoperative atrial fibrillation after noncardiothoracic surgery: clinical and research implications2017 · 26 citations
  4. 4Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation2002 · 24 citations
  5. 5The study protocol for PREDICT AF RECURRENCE: a PRospEctive cohort stuDy of surveIllanCe for perioperaTive Atrial Fibrillation RECURRENCE in major non-cardiac surgery for malignancy2018 · 11 citations