Controlled review shows gene-drive modified mosquitoes can reduce malaria transmission in children, suggesting new vector control strategies.
Malaria remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children in sub-Saharan Africa despite existing vector control and treatment strategies. Gene-drive modified mosquitoes have emerged as a novel approach to reduce malaria transmission sustainably by biasing inheritance to suppress mosquito populations or render them refractory to Plasmodium infection. This controlled review evaluated the efficacy of gene-drive modified mosquitoes in reducing malaria transmission among children in sub-Saharan Africa, synthesising evidence from laboratory, semi-field, and modelling studies. A controlled review approach was conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published between 2010 and 2025 that assessed gene-drive mosquito efficacy in malaria control among children in endemic regions. Laboratory and semi-field studies demonstrate high inheritance rates of gene-drive constructs targeting mosquito fertility or parasite development, leading to rapid population suppression or refractoriness with minimal fitness costs. Modelling studies predict >90% reduction in malaria prevalence within 3–5 years of release, with significant declines in infection incidence, morbidity, and mortality among children. However, field-based efficacy data remain unavailable, and challenges such as resistance evolution, ecological impacts, regulatory preparedness, and ethical concerns regarding community consent and intergenerational effects persist. Gene-drive modified mosquitoes hold promise as a transformative vector control strategy to reduce malaria transmission among children in sub-Saharan Africa. Field trials, robust governance frameworks, and community-led ethical engagement are required to ensure safe, effective, and equitable deployment within integrated malaria elimination programmes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arionget Jemima (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: