Systematic analysis reveals that route complexity and motion dynamics impact odometric drift in robots, indicating a need for improved calibration methods.
Industrial mobile robots face critical positioning challenges that impact manufacturing efficiency, warehouse automation productivity, and biomedical service delivery. This paper presents a reproducible framework for quantifying odometric drift in differential-drive robots, validated by consumer-grade, low-cost VR tracking. Applications include industrial automation calibration, warehouse logistics management, and precision biomedical device positioning. Through more than 750 automated experimental trials spanning a comprehensive matrix of motor configurations and path geometries, the results show that both path complexity and turn size significantly influence drift patterns. Specifically, routes with higher geometric complexity (12-15 segments) exhibited 22% greater position error than simpler paths. The analysis used advanced metrics such as the Normalized Drift Contribution Index. The results confirm robust, high-resolution drift analysis and provide a low-cost validation tool for robot calibration in manufacturing and medical instrumentation. The work provides actionable insights for optimizing robot programming, calibration, and curriculum design, and establishes a scalable protocol for benchmarking autonomous navigation systems in real-world scenarios. In addition, the methodology enables data-driven decision making for robot fleet management, reducing operational downtime compared to manual calibration methods, while providing quantitative performance benchmarks essential for industrial quality control standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skulimowski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: